Pragma-Rhetorical Strategies in British Parliamentary Argumentative Discourse

نویسندگان

چکیده


 This study aims at investigating the pragma-rhetorical structure of argumentative discourse in British Parliament. To achieve this aim, Van Eemeren and Houtlosser’s (2002) model strategic maneuvering is utilized.
 Among important conclusions comes up with are: Both figures, i.e. Prime Minister Jeremy Corbyn parliament utilize certain strategies either to defend or support their standpoints. Besides, Overstatement extends over other figures speech appeals parliamentary makes debates highly rhetorical as a result. Finally, Pathos prevailed appeals. proves that arguers resort feelings stimulation audience’s emotions making arguments

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Rhetorical strategies in German argumentative dialogs

An important factor of argument mining in dialog or multilog data is the framing with which interlocutors put forth their arguments. By using rhetorical devices such as hedging or reference to the Common Ground, speakers relate themselves to their interlocutors, their arguments, and the ongoing discourse. Capitalizing on theoretical linguistic insights into the semantics and pragmatics of disco...

متن کامل

Argumentation Mining in Parliamentary Discourse

We examine whether using frame choices in forum statements can help us identify framing strategies in parliamentary discourse. In this analysis, we show how features based on embedding representations can improve discovering various frames in argumentative political speech. Given the complex nature of the parliamentary discourse, the initial results that are presented here are promising. We fur...

متن کامل

Analyzing Argumentative Discourse Units in Online Interactions

Argument mining of online interactions is in its infancy. One reason is the lack of annotated corpora in this genre. To make progress, we need to develop a principled and scalable way of determining which portions of texts are argumentative and what is the nature of argumentation. We propose a two-tiered approach to achieve this goal and report on several initial studies to assess its potential.

متن کامل

Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays

In this paper, we present a novel approach for identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. The structure of argumentation consists of several components (i.e. claims and premises) that are connected with argumentative relations. We consider this task in two consecutive steps. First, we identify the components of arguments using multiclass classification. Second, we clas...

متن کامل

Argumentative Discourse in L2 German: A Sociocognitive Perspective on the Development of Facework Strategies

This study contributes to the growing field of research on interlanguage pragmatic development with a study on the development of argumentative discourse ability by second language learners of German. I will be focusing on facework, that is, the use of verbal strategies that allow the speaker to have his or her social identities, particular personal qualities, and attributes validate...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: A?d?b al-k?fa?

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1994-8999', '2664-469X']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36317/kaj/2023/v1.i56.12096